Know your Rights When Dealing with Termination of an Oral Farm Lease.

 

 

 


             If I did not farm, or was oblivious to grain prices, there would be one barometer that I could rely on to know what the price of grain is doing, and that is how many phone calls I get regarding oral farm leases and the timing necessary to terminate them.   Every time grain prices go up, I get numerous calls from farmers who have been farming a piece of land under an oral lease, only to find out that the landlord has decided to lease to someone who will pay a higher price.  Because oral leases are somewhat akin to the wild, wild west, the question always asked is whether or not termination was timely given, properly given, and if either did not occur, what are the farmer’s rights.  

             In spite of the mantra of “get it in writing” that we are all told, I would venture to guess that at least a quarter, maybe upwards of half, of farm rental agreements are oral.  Most times, farmers have been farming the same land for many years and things have gone fine with the landowner.  One of the things that upsets the relationship is the death of the landowner or a transfer of the land.  I’ve seen cases where a farm transfers and the new owner has no idea an oral lease is even in place.

             In many states, if not a majority, there is a following of the common law Statute of Frauds (“SOF”).  In short, the SOF requires certain agreements be in writing.   One agreement subject to the SOF are “contracts that cannot be completed in less than one year.”  In other words, any contract where the performance could not occur within a year, needs to be in writing.  Thus, in most states, since a multi-year lease could not be “completed in less than one year”, it would not be valid.   However, a single year oral lease can surely be performed upon in less than a year, so in the majority of farm states, oral leases are valid.   And, most states view that if an oral lease is not terminated property or timely, then the lease renews for another year under the same terms. 

 

            Let us look at Indiana’s oral farm lease law.   Indiana’s oral lease farm law statute says that termination needs to occur with three (3) months from the end of year.   And, the termination notice has to be in writing, which is somewhat strange in that to terminate an oral lease a writing giving the termination notice must be given.  However, confusion has always arisen as to what is the “end of the year”.  Are we talking calendar year or crop year?

             Prior to modern farming practices, corn, wheat, and other crops were shocked and stored in the field to dry.   History tells us that the farmer had to remove the crops prior to March when the ground began to thaw or it was impossible to remove the crops.  So, many have taken the position that crop year actually ends on March 1.   Meaning, written termination must be given before December 1 of the year in order to timely meet the statute.   Others have taken the position that it is the end of the calendar year that sets the deadline.  Thus, three months prior to the end of the year would be September 30th.  The main Indiana Appellate case on this matter states that it is the end of the crop year (i.e. March 1) that sets the deadline.  In that court case, the court looked at the historical farming practices in the particular county (Marshall County) and determined that farmers would shock the crops, need to remove by March, and thus the crop year ended on March 1.   The Court noted that the deadline would thus vary by county depending on the farming practice.  However, it is hard to imagine that farming practices of old varied much across all of Indiana’s 92 counties. 

             The takeaway is that unless written termination is received by the farmer by November 30th, in Indiana the farmer has the legal right to farm the land for the next year.   If the landowner refuses to recognize the lease automatically renewing, then either a lawsuit for specific performance (i.e. an order to lease to the famer) or a suit for damages for lost profits are the available remedies.   Most times, the case comes down to a lawsuit for lost profits either because the new farmer has already entered the land to do fall tillage, fertilizer, or, the farmer decides it is not worth trying to farm someone’s land that they had to haul to court to enforce the lease.  The good news is that I’d be hard pressed to recall any case I’ve had where a farmer’s lease was untimely terminated, and the farmer did not either get paid for lost profits through settlement or a court determination.  This is because the statute is very clear cut in that if termination notice is not given, in writing, the lease renews.  The bottom line is if termination is not timely given in writing, then you’ve either farming again the next year or entitled to damages.

             Numerous other states have varying termination time frames for oral farm lease.   Ohio recently changed its law where if the farm lease does not establish a date or method for terminating the lease, the law requires a landlord who wants to terminate the lease to do so in writing by Sept. 1, or four months from the end of the calendar year.  Kentucky appears to have a six month requirement from the end of the year, making the deadline July 1st.   Like Indiana, Illinois follows the “crop year” method, but gives four months for termination, which would be before October 31.  Michigan takes the cake when it comes to the length of time for giving termination in that an oral year to year farm lease may be terminated by either party by a notice to quit, given at any time to the other party. However, the notice only terminates the lease at the expiration of 1 year from the time of the service of the notice.  Thus, termination does not occur until a year after the notice is given. 

             In closing, no matter what state you are in, if you have an oral lease, it is important to know by what date termination notice must be given to you.  And, these rules draw a very hard line in that if notification is not timely, then your legal right to farm the land renews for another year.  Most times, this enables a farmer to seek enforcement of the lease or damages for not being able to farm.  Thus, legal options should be considered when faced with an untimely or defective termination notice of an oral farm lease.

 

            John J. Schwarz, II, is a lifelong farmer and has been an agricultural law attorney for 17 years and is passionate in helping farm families establish succession plans.  Natalie J. Boocher is a farm elder law and Medicaid planning attorney helping farmers protect their farms from the nursing homes and Medicaid.

 

Both can be reached at 574-643-9999 and www.thefarmlawyer.com.

Go to www.farmlegacy.blogspot.com for past articles.

 

 These articles are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship for specific legal advice.  

 

Location: Royal Center, IN 46978, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION REPEAL BOOGEYMAN-VERSION 4.0

Image
    We have reached that time again where the repeal of the federal estate tax exemption boogeyman (the “Repeal Boogeyman”) is being trotted out by many.   This is the fourth time in my 18-year career this has happened.   Before addressing the Repeal Boogeyman more, let us first look at where things stand as to the federal estate tax exemption. Next year, any person with a pulse will be able to shield $13,610,000 from the federal estate tax.   Together, a married couple can shield $27,220,000.   In 2025, this amount will increase until the estate tax D-Day /Armageddon hits on January 1, 2026.   On that date, the exemption amount will revert to $6,800,000 and be “adjusted for inflation”.   With the high rate of inflation we have seen over the past few years, many believe, when adjusted for inflation, the new exclusion amount will be around 7.5 million per person.    Meaning, even if the Repeal Boogeyman has his way, a married couple can...
Read more

Estate Planning, Medicaid Preparation, or Both?

Image
 In our last article the discussion centered around the importance of planning in advance for the possibility of needing Medicaid in the future.   Essentially the idea being to plan for the worst, and hope for the best.   This type of forethought is imperative given that Medicaid requires planning to occur at least five years in advance of needing assistance with paying for the costs of home assisted living or long-term nursing care. The Medicaid Estate Recovery Program allows the government to place a lien on any real estate owned by the Medicaid recipient after death. If you are 55 years and older, and receive Medicaid coverage, your assets are subject to a Medicaid lien without the proper planning.    Depending on the level of care needed, according to recent Genworth figures, the average cost of assisted living is $4,500 per month, and the average monthly cost of skilled nursing is $8,910. Failing to plan for how to pay for these costs can result in the lo...
Read more

Medicaid-Why you and your farm should care.

Image
Medicaid – What is it and why should you (and your farm) should care? Our law firm frequently gets calls from clients wanting to inquire about making a Last Will and Testament or appointing someone as Power of Attorney.   This is quite often prompted by the death of a loved one, the diagnosis of an unexpected illness, or being told of a negative estate experience by a friend or neighbor.   Estate planning at any stage of life is something we would always encourage, but there is an aspect of planning that we often times find overlooked and that is planning in advance for Medicaid. There is much confusion about not only the difference between Medicare and Medicaid, but how and what each program covers specifically.   For the purposes of this article, we will be focusing the discussion on long term care needs such as the expense of a nursing home.   For that discussion, the only important thing to note about Medicare, including Medicare supplement insurance, is t...
Read more